Hello,
this patch fixes an obvious typo. Regtested without problem, and I
manually checked that the new return value of max() makes more sense.
2015-04-28 Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr>
PR libstdc++/65883
* include/std/limits (numeric_limits): Add missing unsigned.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: include/std/limits
===================================================================
--- include/std/limits (revision 222524)
+++ include/std/limits (working copy)
@@ -1483,21 +1483,22 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
\
template<>
\
struct numeric_limits<unsigned TYPE>
\
{
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR bool is_specialized = true;
\
\
static _GLIBCXX_CONSTEXPR unsigned TYPE
\
min() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT { return 0; }
\
\
static _GLIBCXX_CONSTEXPR unsigned TYPE
\
- max() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT { return __glibcxx_max_b (TYPE, BITSIZE); }
\
+ max() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT
\
+ { return __glibcxx_max_b (unsigned TYPE, BITSIZE); }
\
\
UEXT
\
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR int digits
\
= BITSIZE;
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR int digits10
\
= BITSIZE * 643L / 2136;
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR bool is_signed = false;
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR bool is_integer = true;
\
static _GLIBCXX_USE_CONSTEXPR bool is_exact = true;
\
