----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:04:04PM -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 04:07:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > bump the libgcj soname on the trunk, as done for every release cycle,
> > > 
> > > Is that really needed though these days?
> > > Weren't there basically zero changes to libjava (both libjava and
> > > libjava/classpath) in the last 2 or more years?
> > > The few ones were mostly updating Copyright notices, minor configure
> > > changes, but I really haven't seen anything ABI changing for quite a
> > > while.
> > > 
> > 
> > On the Classpath side, there's a bunch of stuff to merge in that would
> > change the ABI. It's a matter of finding a good point at which to do it
> > and time to do so. I keep missing the right point in the gcc lifecycle.
> 
> Now might be a good time (any time next 6.5 months or so), and if that is
> done, surely I have no issue with bumping the soname.
> 

Ok, that should be possible.

>       Jakub
> 

-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07

Reply via email to