The following two libgcc patches have seen almost no comments, and
certainly neither testing or review in a week:
CFT: [build] Move fp-bit support to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00927.html
CFT: [build] Move soft-fp support to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00931.html
This patch will need to be updated for the recent addition of the c6x
port.
Both will probably need build and libgcc maintainers and either a bunch
of target maintainers or a global reviewer. I wonder how to proceed
here: I've got a bunch of further libgcc patches in the works or
planned, but if I can't get them reviewed, there's no point in
continuing that work.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
