Yep, thanks -- I just finished testing that, and it fixes the problem with no regressions. Thanks for the help.
Is this ok to commit? Thanks, Bill On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 19:46 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 06:39:59PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > The " && special_op != SH_NONE" test from the second if can go then, > > because it is never true. And I'd really think that you shouldn't change > > just the fmt[i] == 'E' handling, but also the fmt[i] == 'e' || fmt[i] == 'u' > > handling a few lines earlier (both the added > > "if (special_op == SH_NONE) continue;" there and > > removal of " && special_op != SH_NONE". > > In particular, this is what I had in mind. > > 2015-04-17 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > PR target/65787 > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rtx_is_swappable_p): Remove previous > fix; ensure that a subsequent SH_NONE operand does not overwrite > an existing *special value. > > --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c.jj 2015-04-17 19:09:59.000000000 +0200 > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c 2015-04-17 19:28:43.264784372 +0200 > @@ -34204,17 +34204,6 @@ rtx_is_swappable_p (rtx op, unsigned int > else > return 0; > > - case PARALLEL: > - /* A vec_extract operation may be wrapped in a PARALLEL with a > - clobber, so account for that possibility. */ > - if (XVECLEN (op, 0) != 2) > - return 0; > - > - if (GET_CODE (XVECEXP (op, 0, 1)) != CLOBBER) > - return 0; > - > - return rtx_is_swappable_p (XVECEXP (op, 0, 0), special); > - > case UNSPEC: > { > /* Various operations are unsafe for this optimization, at least > @@ -34296,10 +34285,11 @@ rtx_is_swappable_p (rtx op, unsigned int > { > unsigned int special_op = SH_NONE; > ok &= rtx_is_swappable_p (XEXP (op, i), &special_op); > + if (special_op == SH_NONE) > + continue; > /* Ensure we never have two kinds of special handling > for the same insn. */ > - if (*special != SH_NONE && special_op != SH_NONE > - && *special != special_op) > + if (*special != SH_NONE && *special != special_op) > return 0; > *special = special_op; > } > @@ -34308,10 +34298,11 @@ rtx_is_swappable_p (rtx op, unsigned int > { > unsigned int special_op = SH_NONE; > ok &= rtx_is_swappable_p (XVECEXP (op, i, j), &special_op); > + if (special_op == SH_NONE) > + continue; > /* Ensure we never have two kinds of special handling > for the same insn. */ > - if (*special != SH_NONE && special_op != SH_NONE > - && *special != special_op) > + if (*special != SH_NONE && *special != special_op) > return 0; > *special = special_op; > } > > > Jakub >