Hi, Rainer - On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:34:27PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > [...] > On the other hand, there's the question why tree-mudflap.c tries to > create a constructor with a non-default priority on a platform with > SUPPORTS_INIT_PRIORITY == 0 or at all [...]
For the "at all" part, I believe the intent was to make it more likely that mudflap-tracked literals be tracked early enough so that other constructors would find them already available for checking. - FChE
