Hi!
As PR59448 started promoting consume to acquire and as written by Torvald,
that isn't going to change any time soon unless the standard is clarified,
this patch adjusts the two PPC testcases for that.
Ok for trunk?
2015-02-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR testsuite/64930
* gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c: Adjust expected count of isync
instructions for 2015-01-14 get_memmodel changes.
* gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p8.c: Likewise.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c.jj 2014-11-11
00:05:43.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p7.c 2015-02-11
18:36:48.208282824 +0100
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stdcx" 6 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "stqcx" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "bl __atomic" 6 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "isync" 12 } } */
+/* As since PR59448 GCC promotes consume to acquire, the expected isync count
+ is 16 rather than 12. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "isync" 16 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "lwsync" 8 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mtvsrd" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mtvsrwa" } } */
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p8.c.jj 2014-11-11
00:05:43.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/atomic-p8.c 2015-02-11
18:37:00.992070778 +0100
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stdcx" 7 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stqcx" 7 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "bl __atomic" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "isync" 20 } } */
+/* As since PR59448 GCC promotes consume to acquire, the expected isync count
+ is 25 rather than 20. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "isync" 25 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "lwsync" 10 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mtvsrd" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mtvsrwa" } } */
Jakub
