On 02/09/2015 01:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> As you can see, the updated testcase fails even on x86_64-linux.
> 
> Here is an updated patch that succeeds even on i686-linux.

Your patch fixes my testcase on s390x. Thanks!

-Andreas-

> 
> 2015-02-09  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR target/64979
>       * tree-stdarg.c (pass_stdarg::execute): Scan phi node args for
>       va_list escapes.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-7.c: New test.
>       * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64979.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/tree-stdarg.c.jj      2015-01-09 21:59:44.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-stdarg.c 2015-02-09 13:14:43.880406573 +0100
> @@ -856,22 +856,23 @@ pass_stdarg::execute (function *fun)
>        /* For va_list_simple_ptr, we have to check PHI nodes too.  We treat
>        them as assignments for the purpose of escape analysis.  This is
>        not needed for non-simple va_list because virtual phis don't perform
> -      any real data movement.  */
> -      if (va_list_simple_ptr)
> +      any real data movement.  Also, check PHI nodes for taking address of
> +      the va_list vars.  */
> +      tree lhs, rhs;
> +      use_operand_p uop;
> +      ssa_op_iter soi;
> +
> +      for (gphi_iterator i = gsi_start_phis (bb); !gsi_end_p (i);
> +        gsi_next (&i))
>       {
> -       tree lhs, rhs;
> -       use_operand_p uop;
> -       ssa_op_iter soi;
> +       gphi *phi = i.phi ();
> +       lhs = PHI_RESULT (phi);
> 
> -       for (gphi_iterator i = gsi_start_phis (bb); !gsi_end_p (i);
> -            gsi_next (&i))
> -         {
> -           gphi *phi = i.phi ();
> -           lhs = PHI_RESULT (phi);
> -
> -           if (virtual_operand_p (lhs))
> -             continue;
> +       if (virtual_operand_p (lhs))
> +         continue;
> 
> +       if (va_list_simple_ptr)
> +         {
>             FOR_EACH_PHI_ARG (uop, phi, soi, SSA_OP_USE)
>               {
>                 rhs = USE_FROM_PTR (uop);
> @@ -894,6 +895,22 @@ pass_stdarg::execute (function *fun)
>                   }
>               }
>           }
> +
> +       for (unsigned j = 0; !va_list_escapes
> +                            && j < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); ++j)
> +         if ((!va_list_simple_ptr
> +              || TREE_CODE (gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, j)) != SSA_NAME)
> +             && walk_tree (gimple_phi_arg_def_ptr (phi, j),
> +                           find_va_list_reference, &wi, NULL))
> +           {
> +             if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +               {
> +                 fputs ("va_list escapes in ", dump_file);
> +                 print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, phi, 0, dump_flags);
> +                 fputc ('\n', dump_file);
> +               }
> +             va_list_escapes = true;
> +           }
>       }
> 
>        for (gimple_stmt_iterator i = gsi_start_bb (bb);
> @@ -916,8 +933,8 @@ pass_stdarg::execute (function *fun)
> 
>         if (is_gimple_assign (stmt))
>           {
> -           tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
> -           tree rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
> +           lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
> +           rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
> 
>             if (va_list_simple_ptr)
>               {
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-7.c.jj       2015-02-09 
> 12:54:44.222284401 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-7.c  2015-02-09 12:58:10.406875647 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/* PR target/64979 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-stdarg" } */
> +
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +
> +void bar (int x, va_list *ap);
> +
> +void
> +foo (int x, ...)
> +{
> +  va_list ap;
> +  int n;
> +
> +  va_start (ap, x);
> +  n = va_arg (ap, int);
> +  bar (x, (va_list *) ((n == 0) ? ((void *) 0) : &ap));
> +  va_end (ap);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "foo: va_list escapes 1, needs to save all 
> GPR units and all FPR units" "stdarg" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "stdarg" } } */
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64979.c.jj  2015-02-09 
> 12:54:01.867984625 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64979.c     2015-02-09 
> 13:08:17.458818847 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* PR target/64979 */
> +
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +
> +void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
> +bar (int x, va_list *ap)
> +{
> +  if (ap)
> +    {
> +      int i;
> +      for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> +     if (i != va_arg (*ap, int))
> +       __builtin_abort ();
> +      if (va_arg (*ap, double) != 0.5)
> +     __builtin_abort ();
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
> +foo (int x, ...)
> +{
> +  va_list ap;
> +  int n;
> +
> +  va_start (ap, x);
> +  n = va_arg (ap, int);
> +  bar (x, (va_list *) ((n == 0) ? ((void *) 0) : &ap));
> +  va_end (ap);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  foo (100, 1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0.5);
> +  return 0;
> +}
> 
> 
>       Jakub
> 

Reply via email to