On 26-01-15 15:47, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -Wuninitialized" } */
+
+int a, l, m;
+float *b;
+float c, d, e, g, h;
+unsigned char i, k;
+void
+fn1 (int p1, float *f1, float *f2, float *f3, unsigned char *c1, float *f4,
+ unsigned char *c2, float *p10)
+{
+ if (p1 & 8)
+ b[3] = p10[a]; /* { dg-warning "may be used uninitialized" } */
+}
+
+void
+fn2 ()
+{
+ float *n;
+ if (l & 6)
+ n = &c + m;
+ fn1 (l, &d, &e, &g, &i, &h, &k, n);
+}
Hi Richard,
this new test fails with -fpic, because fn1 is not inlined.
Adding static to fn1 allows it to pass both with and without -fpic. But that
change might affect whether it still serves as a regression test for this PR,
I'm not sure.
Another way to fix this could be to use the warning line number 22 instead 13
for fpic.
Thanks,
- Tom
