>> did with -gdwarf-4). We're still putting a version number of 2 in the >> compilation unit header! But I guess even upgrading the CU header to > > We are not. On most targets we default to -gdwarf-4 and emit v. 4:
Oops, sorry, you're right. I carelessly misread this: dw2_asm_output_data (2, ver, "DWARF version number"); and read the "2" as the version, not the size. As long as we're capping the version number at 4 until we can actually write a proper version 5 header, this is fine. -cary
