On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > I don't think this needs to go on the 4.9 branch, apparently I'm the > only person who's noticed the problem. I expect it's quite rare to try > using those functions with forward iterators.
Sorry, I was not talking about the first patch which fixes the forward iterator problem, because it's already checked into 4.9; I'm suggesting the last one, who fixes the first one :) -- Regards, Tim Shen
