On Jul 12, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > As a prerequisite to moving i386/crtprec.c to toplevel libgcc, it turned > out that I need to move darwin-crt[23].c first to avoid the problem with > inconsistent versions of extra_parts in gcc and libgcc: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00831.html > > The following pretty mechanical patch does this. > > Bootstraps on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 and powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 are > well beyond stage1 now, so libgcc and thus crt?.o build correctly. > > Ok for mainline if they pass?
Ok.