On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Saturday 2015-01-03 17:59, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> > * most places in the manual use "null" or more rarely "@code{NULL}"
> > rather than "NULL"
>
> So, should this be documented in gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html?
Expanding / revising where it says "NULL should be written as
<code>@code{NULL}</code>" (to exclude use of plain un-marked-up NULL)?
(I think natural logic is something like: "null" as an adjective, e.g.
"null pointer", @code{NULL} (or e.g. @code{NULL_TREE}) if naming a
specific value, no use of un-marked-up "NULL". But I'm not sure there's a
real distinction between e.g. "the value is non-null" and "the value is
non-@code{NULL}", so that doesn't actually say which to use in such
cases.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]
