Robert Suchanek <robert.sucha...@imgtec.com> writes: > Here is the revised patch that would handle the other cases as per Richard's > comments. > > I slightly modified Matthew's proposed patch and used split_const > instead of get_related_value. AFAICS, the canonical form would always have > the 'plus' expression. > > The offset on the high part is most likely not important as the code > generation > has to guarantee that the low part represents the true address in the case > where the high and lo_sum are directly related.
This looks good to me FWIW. Thanks, Richard
