On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > On 07/05/2011 04:27 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/explow.c b/gcc/explow.c >>> index 7387dad..b343bf8 100644 >>> --- a/gcc/explow.c >>> +++ b/gcc/explow.c >>> @@ -383,18 +383,13 @@ convert_memory_address_addr_space (enum >>> machine_mode to_mode ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, >>> >>> case PLUS: >>> case MULT: >>> - /* For addition we can safely permute the conversion and addition >>> - operation if one operand is a constant and converting the >>> constant >>> - does not change it or if one operand is a constant and we are >>> - using a ptr_extend instruction (POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED< 0). >>> - We can always safely permute them if we are making the address >>> - narrower. */ >>> + /* For addition we safely permute the conversion and addition >>> + operation if one operand is a constant since we can't generate >>> + new instructions. We can always safely permute them if we are >>> + making the address narrower. */ >>> if (GET_MODE_SIZE (to_mode)< GET_MODE_SIZE (from_mode) >>> || (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS >>> -&& CONST_INT_P (XEXP (x, 1)) >>> -&& (XEXP (x, 1) == convert_memory_address_addr_space >>> - (to_mode, XEXP (x, 1), as) >>> - || POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED< 0))) >>> +&& CONST_INT_P (XEXP (x, 1)))) >>> return gen_rtx_fmt_ee (GET_CODE (x), to_mode, >>> convert_memory_address_addr_space >>> (to_mode, XEXP (x, 0), as), > > This does not seem safe to me. > > Paolo >
The current code is broken for x32. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47727 We can't generate any new instructions. Do you have any suggestions. Thanks. -- H.J.