On January 5, 2015 6:01:41 PM CET, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>The SSA_NAME range info consists of two fields, SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO
>pointer
>and SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P flag, but the recently added clearing of
>range
>info cleared just SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO, leading to ICE on the following
>testcase where we asserted that SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P flag is cleared
>on a SSA_NAME that doesn't have SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO non-NULL.
>
>Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok
>for
>trunk?
OK.
Thanks
Richard.
>2015-01-05 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/64494
> * tree-ssa-loop-im.c (move_computations_dom_walker::before_dom): Also
> clear SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P flag.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64494.c: New test.
>
>--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c.jj 2014-12-10 20:57:54.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c 2015-01-05 10:34:26.294637773 +0100
>@@ -1236,7 +1236,11 @@ move_computations_dom_walker::before_dom
> && (!ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb)
> || (ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb) != level
> && !flow_loop_nested_p (ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb), level))))
>- SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (gimple_assign_lhs (new_stmt)) = NULL;
>+ {
>+ tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (new_stmt);
>+ SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (lhs) = NULL;
>+ SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (lhs) = 0;
>+ }
> gsi_insert_on_edge (loop_preheader_edge (level), new_stmt);
> remove_phi_node (&bsi, false);
> }
>@@ -1302,7 +1306,11 @@ move_computations_dom_walker::before_dom
> && (!ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb)
> || !(ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb) == level
> || flow_loop_nested_p (ALWAYS_EXECUTED_IN (bb), level))))
>- SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (gimple_get_lhs (stmt)) = NULL;
>+ {
>+ tree lhs = gimple_get_lhs (stmt);
>+ SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (lhs) = NULL;
>+ SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (lhs) = 0;
>+ }
> /* In case this is a stmt that is not unconditionally executed
> when the target loop header is executed and the stmt may
> invoke undefined integer or pointer overflow rewrite it to
>--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64494.c.jj 2015-01-05
>10:38:11.766781507 +0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr64494.c 2015-01-05
>10:37:58.000000000 +0100
>@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>+/* PR tree-optimization/64494 */
>+
>+int a, b;
>+unsigned char c;
>+
>+int
>+main ()
>+{
>+ int d;
>+ a = 0;
>+ for (d = 0; d < 2; d++)
>+ {
>+ a &= (b >= 1);
>+ c = (204 > (((unsigned char) ~0) >> a)) ? 0 : 204 << a;
>+ b = 0;
>+ }
>+ return 0;
>+}
>
> Jakub
