Hi, On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> Hm, I didn't think it was (currently) possible for a gimple statement to
> have a mem-ref on both RHS and LHS. Is that incorrect? This is easily
> changed if so, or if the possibility should be left open for the future.
Think aggregate copies:
void bla (struct S *d, struct S *s) { *d = *s; }
Ciao,
Michael.
