On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Bruce Korb wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > It happens that OpenBSD suffers from a bogus fixinclude that changes > > its perfectly valid NULL define from (void *)0 to 0. The fix itself > > appears to be very old and is completely bogus - it replaces > > (void *)0 with 0 under the assumption the former is invalid for C++ - > > which is true - but 0 is inappropriate for C which is much worse. > > > > Thus, I propose to remove the fix altogether. Platform maintainers > > can arrange for a new fix if the platforms still need fixing (which > > I seriously doubt after so many years and platform obsoletion). > > > > This restores bootstrap on OpenBSD. > > > > Ok for trunk and active branches? > > Sounds completely reasonable to me, but I think the platform maintainers > do need to say, "okay". Cheers - Bruce
We do not have an Interix maintainer listed, that leaves David for AIX. David, is this ok? If not, can you please work on a better more specific fixinclude wrapping the C++ variant inside __GNUG__? Thanks, Richard.
