On 7/1/11, Gabriel Charette <gch...@google.com> wrote: > One problem now though: `// pph asm xdiff`, only flags for asm diffs, > but those could be different diffs after a change (for the better or > worse) and this won't be caught. It's probably hard to get something > precise on this, but maybe we could simply add the # of lines of diff > expected, e.g. `// pph asm xdiff 32`. Then we XFAIL if the number of > expected lines in the diff match, but actually fail if the number of > lines in the diff is now different. > > I'm not very familiar with dg.. Is that doable? Would be very helpful > at this stage.
That looks easy enough. I need to finish the current test stuff before I get to that though. -- Lawrence Crowl
