On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 14:56, Lawrence Crowl <cr...@google.com> wrote: > On 6/27/11, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: >> On Jun 27, 2011 Gabriel Charette <gch...@google.com> wrote: >> > Just wondering why you're naming x finishing by an underscore >> > "x_", this is a valid name, but just thinking it's tricky syntax, >> > does this test anything more? or is it just a preference for >> > private members? >> >> No real reason. Just a quick hack I was trying to compile with >> pph enabled. > > There is a convention in Google (and elsewhere) to mark data member > fields with a trailing underscore in their name. This convention > makes it easy to identify field accesses, which helps avoid > performance problems (unnecessary reloads) and correctness problems > (missing reloads in the presence of aliasing).
That's probably where I picked it from. I wasn't really thinking about the code itself. Just wanted to get some simple C++ executable test. Diego.
