On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > No, that's still the case, just getting confused by the need to also support > constant initialization of non-literal types.
Ah, thanks! -- Gaby
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > No, that's still the case, just getting confused by the need to also support > constant initialization of non-literal types.
Ah, thanks! -- Gaby