On 06/16/2011 12:22 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi all,
if the RHS is an array constructor, gfortran didn't deep copy
allocatable components. That was fixed for the trunk by the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00095.html
The wrong-code issue is not a regression and code leading to
the bug seems to be sparse, judging how many compilers are
affected by the bug (cf. PR).
Nethertheless, I am considering to backport it to 4.6. One
could also backport it to 4.5 or even 4.4.
What do you think?
Tobias
If it is possible to get computational results that are incorrect without
realizing it then I think there is a strong case for back port.
Jerry