On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > We're updating REG_DEAD notes in regrename.c, but it seems this is for > historical reasons only. As far as I can tell, every pass that needs > such notes recomputes them with df_note_add_problem/df_analyze, and the > following patch bootstrapped and tested successfully on i686-linux (some > random libmudflap failures mentioned previously), with the following > change to ensure it's tested: > > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
(Not a dbr target...) > Ok? NO! They're still used by reorg.c+resource.c brgds, H-P
