On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:52:18PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Well, Steve has a patch for non_strict_align effective_target
> > in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00673.html
> > (with s/strict_align/non_strict_align/g ), I was hoping it would be
> > reviewed and I'd just adjust the testcase to use it as well.
> 
> Would it be applied to the 4.6 branch as well?  If no, I think you should 
> apply 
> your patch to trunk and 4.6 branch and let Steve adjust it on trunk later.

I'd say it should be applied there as well.

Here is what I've just bootstrapped/regtested, Steve's patch with that
s/strict_align/non_strict_align/g plus a smallish change on top of that.

Mike, is this ok for trunk/4.6?

2011-06-14  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/48377
        * gcc.dg/vect/pr48377.c: Add dg-require-effective-target
        non_strict_align.

2011-06-14  Steve Ellcey  <s...@cup.hp.com>

        PR middle-end/49191
        * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_non_strict_align):
        New.
        * gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align.

--- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (revision 174336)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (working copy)
@@ -3901,3 +3901,11 @@
     return 1
 }
 
+proc check_effective_target_non_strict_align {} {
+    return [check_no_compiler_messages non_strict_align assembly {
+       char *y;
+       typedef char __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__))) c;
+       c *z;
+       void foo(void) { z = (c *) y; }
+    } "-Wcast-align"]
+}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c     (revision 174336)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c     (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align } */
 
 int get_int(const void *p)
 {
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr48377.c.jj      2011-05-02 18:39:10.000000000 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr48377.c 2011-06-03 13:19:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* PR tree-optimization/48377 */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align } */
 
 typedef unsigned int U __attribute__((__aligned__ (1), __may_alias__));
 


        Jakub

Reply via email to