On 6/2/11 2:42 PM, "Langton, Asher" <langt...@llnl.gov> wrote: >On 6/2/11 2:11 PM, "Steve Kargl" <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >>On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:59:03PM -0700, Langton, Asher wrote: >>> This patch fixes a bug where the wrong code was generated for >>>assumed-size >>> Cray pointees. The fix is simple, but a bit ugly. Bootstrapped and >>> regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for trunk? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Asher >>> >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langt...@llnl.gov> >>> >>> PR fortran/49268 >>> * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Treat assumed-size >>>Cray >>> pointees as AS_EXPLICIT. >>> >>> 2011-06-02 Asher Langton <langt...@llnl.gov> >>> >>> PR fortran/49268 >>> * gfortran.dg/PR49268.f90: New test. >> >>OK. > >Committed at revision 174584.
A gfortran user here at LLNL asked if this could be backported to the 4.6 branch. I bootstrapped and regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Okay for 4.6? Thanks, Asher
PR49268-4_6.diff
Description: PR49268-4_6.diff
