On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 11:05:25AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > David, do you have any idea if this is what it's supposed to be? > > > > Ok for trunk? > > The header certainly does not make sense as is and does not follow AIX > header file conventions. typedef is the only thing that makes sense, > which was confirmed by some other AIX developer with whom I checked. > (I would have expected fc_softc_t as well if it was intended as a > typedef, but that's a separate issue.) > > This change is okay.
Thanks, committed in r174707 with Bruce's change to the test. > > I will try to find the AIX header owners to fix the problem as well. That would be great. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman po...@thewrittenword.com
