On 5/26/11, Nathan Froyd <froy...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 05/26/2011 10:24 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote: >> Index: gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c >> =================================================================== >> --- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c (revision 174301) >> +++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c (working copy) >> @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ cp_tree_size (enum tree_code code) >> >> case TEMPLATE_INFO: return sizeof (struct >> tree_template_info); >> >> + case TREE_BINFO: return sizeof (struct tree_binfo); >> + >> default: >> gcc_unreachable (); >> } > > This does not look right; TREE_BINFO is a variable-sized structure > (and is not C++-specific in any event).
I'd forgotten that. > Maybe you should be using tree_size instead of tree_code_size > someplace? Hm. Possibly. The PPH system is still mostly C, and so C++ parts are being dropped, which could cause a different path further upstream. -- Lawrence Crowl
