-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/25/11 15:27, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch solves problem > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154 for SPARC. SPARC FPCC > registers were excluded from pressure classes because the movement > between them is costly. Therefore the assert was triggered again. > Common logic says that it should be a pressure class because the > registers are common and that is attributed that the class has no > subclasses. > > The patch was bootstrapped on x86-64 and teststed on the same targets > (about 10 of them) + regular SPARC (without soft floating point). > > > Ok to commit? > > 2011-05-25 Vladimir Makarov <vmaka...@redhat.com> > > PR rtl-optimization/49154 > * ira.c (setup_pressure_classes): Process class without sublcasses > as a candidate for pressure classes. OK Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3oKyAAoJEBRtltQi2kC767sH/2V5jrDzAt4zDLpS1go78QBq l03YV1rfy/MG19HBcFcS0rNcGXHUobo0dQxS8woqY75GOmU29HpLuyh5ps6l18gK YX4gWvbJADnOK9eyFQ0TjdGLAZCx6w4SMcIpUpurYh8e6iFqBUbHEf+KvO5bIhiE EkXhMcMy3fX/EWmvK7kJWkKGAxYDI3mvyz6RUB0oMlgK1PcW5eW7IQWPXnerHRTi dNdaVZ6VUiJVPyehKKxfIAsmZM6K0R6q6jYsAGx+ewOtjRq5Vz6gQkAhJKgZ7uGM 747LXBlLRmyS9giGehviqPsep5m5/u2eb/uiVu4ypAGUj7iFeePJY6B1tbiPETA= =5Ps1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
