"Joseph S. Myers" <jos...@codesourcery.com> writes:
> I haven't tested building mips-tdump or mips-tfile with this patch,
> but don't think it should cause any problems as the static linker
> should just ignore the diagnostics objects for those programs. In
> principle mips-tfile should use the common code instead of its own
> implementations of error and fancy_abort, but I doubt it's worth
> converting it (the line-number handling makes it a nontrivial
> conversion as that would need to move to the line-map infrastructure
> as well).
Indeed: if any more work is spent in this area, it should be to get gas
working again on Tru64 UNIX and get rid of mips-t* completely.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
