On Fri, 13 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> +#define PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS(x, class) (class)
> >
> > This macro is being phased out and replaced by a target hook. In general
> > any target macro whose only use is in targhooks.c to provide a default
> > transitional version of a hook should not be defined by a new port; new
> > ports should define the hooks directly for all macros that are at that
> > stage in transition to being hooks.
>
> Any others you spotted? I took care of a few of them earlier
> (PRINT_OPERAND etc.). Maybe we need a poison_warn pragma?
I didn't spot any others.
> >> +GCC_4.5.0 {
> >
> > 4.7.0 seems more appropriate for a new configuration.
>
> Even if we also add this to our 4.5 based tree?
Yes. Backporting
%inherit GCC_4.6.0 GCC_4.5.0
GCC_4.6.0 {
}
%inherit GCC_4.7.0 GCC_4.6.0
GCC_4.7.0 {
}
in libgcc-std.ver is easy. (The latter isn't yet in trunk, it's added by
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02130.html>; whatever the
first patch to go in trunk with GCC_4.7.0 symbol versions is needs to add
it to libgcc-std.ver.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
[email protected]
