Jerry,
>> The failure vanishes with -ffloat-store, so I propose the following
>> patch, tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 with the appropriate runtest
>> invocation.
>>
>> Ok for mainline?
>
> This is OK. We are working on a solution, so maybe it would be better to
> XFAIL it so that when it does get fixed it will be flagged. It also fails
> on i686-pc-gnu.
is this a solution for this particular case or for the general need to
sometimes use -ffloat-store? In the former case, I'd agree, in the
latter it's probably better to consistently use -ffloat-store in the
testcases and review those uses once a solution is in place.
I also saw the same failure on 32-bit Linux/x86, so the XFAIL would have
to be for { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && ilp32.
Let me know what you prefer.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
