> Shouldn't there be a warning from newer gcc, i.e. from trunk?
The code in GCC 4.3 reads:
/* Inline declaration after use or definition.
??? Should we still warn about this now we have unit-at-a-time
mode and can get it right?
Definitely don't complain if the decls are in different translation
units.
C99 permits this, so don't warn in that case. (The function
may not be inlined everywhere in function-at-a-time mode, but
we still shouldn't warn.) */
if (DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (newdecl) && !DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (olddecl)
&& same_translation_unit_p (olddecl, newdecl)
&& flag_gnu89_inline)
{
if (TREE_USED (olddecl))
{
warning (0, "%q+D declared inline after being called", olddecl);
warned = true;
}
else if (DECL_INITIAL (olddecl))
{
warning (0, "%q+D declared inline after its definition", olddecl);
warned = true;
}
}
It was removed by:
2008-07-24 Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz>
* cgraphbuild.c (record_reference): Drop non-unit-at-a-time code.
(build_cgraph_edges): Likewise.
[...]
* c-decl.c (diagnose_mismatched_decls): Do not require inline keyword
early in GNU dialect.
so I presume that the answer is no.
--
Eric Botcazou
