On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I was removing the cgraph_node function I noticed that
> cgraph_preserve_function_body_p takes a tree decl parameter which it
> immediately converts to a call graph node while its two callers get
> the decl from a node they already have.  This seems wasteful and so
> the patch below changes the parameter to be a cgraph_node which avoids
> the lookup.
>
> Because cgraph_get_node(node->decl) may be a way of getting the actual
> node for a same body alias (a strange way, but well...), I added a
> test for same body aliases to the function too.
>
> I have bootstrapped and tested the patch on x86_64-linux without
> problems.  OK for trunk?

An alias shouldn't have a body, so why not assert !node->same_body_alias
instead.?

Richard.

> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
>
> 2011-04-22  Martin Jambor  <mjam...@suse.cz>
>
>        * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_preserve_function_body_p): Accept a cgraph
>        node instead of a decl.  Update all callers.
>        * cgraph.h: Update declaration.
>
> Index: src/gcc/cgraphunit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/cgraphunit.c
> +++ src/gcc/cgraphunit.c
> @@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ cgraph_expand_function (struct cgraph_no
>   /* Make sure that BE didn't give up on compiling.  */
>   gcc_assert (TREE_ASM_WRITTEN (decl));
>   current_function_decl = NULL;
> -  gcc_assert (!cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (decl));
> +  gcc_assert (!cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (node));
>   cgraph_release_function_body (node);
>   /* Eliminate all call edges.  This is important so the GIMPLE_CALL no longer
>      points to the dead function body.  */
> @@ -1756,13 +1756,12 @@ cgraph_output_in_order (void)
>  /* Return true when function body of DECL still needs to be kept around
>    for later re-use.  */
>  bool
> -cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (tree decl)
> +cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (struct cgraph_node *node)
>  {
> -  struct cgraph_node *node;
> -
>   gcc_assert (cgraph_global_info_ready);
> +  if (node->same_body_alias)
> +    node = node->same_body;
>   /* Look if there is any clone around.  */
> -  node = cgraph_get_node (decl);
>   if (node->clones)
>     return true;
>   return false;
> Index: src/gcc/ipa-inline-transform.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/ipa-inline-transform.c
> +++ src/gcc/ipa-inline-transform.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ inline_transform (struct cgraph_node *no
>
>   /* We might need the body of this function so that we can expand
>      it inline somewhere else.  */
> -  if (cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (node->decl))
> +  if (cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (node))
>     save_inline_function_body (node);
>
>   for (e = node->callees; e; e = e->next_callee)
> Index: src/gcc/cgraph.h
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/cgraph.h
> +++ src/gcc/cgraph.h
> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ void cgraph_mark_needed_node (struct cgr
>  void cgraph_mark_address_taken_node (struct cgraph_node *);
>  void cgraph_mark_reachable_node (struct cgraph_node *);
>  bool cgraph_inline_p (struct cgraph_edge *, cgraph_inline_failed_t *reason);
> -bool cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (tree);
> +bool cgraph_preserve_function_body_p (struct cgraph_node *);
>  void verify_cgraph (void);
>  void verify_cgraph_node (struct cgraph_node *);
>  void cgraph_build_static_cdtor (char which, tree body, int priority);
>
>

Reply via email to