On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:50:26PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > build_int_cst looks seriously broken, I think we want to make it > an alias of build_int_cst_type, or rather call that from > build_int_cst.
The comment above build_int_cst_type talks about it: "We cannot however make this a default behavior of build_int_cst without more intrusive changes, since there are parts of gcc that rely on the extra precision of the integer constants." Jakub