> > Why is VEC any better in terms of density ? Are you suggesting using a > hash table? It is not any better, but we usually use VEC for variably sized arrays like this one. Not that I would be big fan of its API, but at least it fives bounds checking that would catch bugs like one you are fixing more reliably.
Honza > > > , making init_pid_map to allocate it cleared and add also > > test that VEC_index (pid_map, pid) is not NULL in addition to the bound > > check > > above. > > > > Also we ought to free pids once the IPA profiling pass is done. I.e. at the > > end of tree_profling > > function. > > Yes. > > Thanks, > > David > > > > > Honza > >
