* Jack Howarth wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 12:20:00AM CEST:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > --- config/cloog.m4 (revision 166641)
> > +++ config/cloog.m4 (working copy)
> > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
> > ;;
> > "ISL")
> > clooginc="${clooginc} ${_cloogorginc}"
> > - clooglibs="${clooglibs} -lcloog-isl"
> > + clooglibs="${clooglibs} -lcloog-isl -lisl"
> > cloog_org=yes
> > ;;
> > "PPL")
> Are we certain that it is essential to explicitly link in -lisl?
> This change has caused an unnecessary rebuild of FSF gcc when upgrading
> cloog.org from 0.16.1 to 0.16.2 due to the soversion bump on libisl.
> Do we know of any direct calls from graphite into libisl? If all accesses
> are done through the API in libcloog-isl, which hasn't been version bumped,
> the extra linkage on -lisl would appear to be unnecessary.
What about static only links?
Cheers,
Ralf
