> Isn't one of the effects of this patch to generate debug info for the > artificial label decl?
No, DECL_IGNORED_P is preserved on the label decl. > When I first saw your patch, I thought "FORCED_LABEL()", perhaps I'm > not sure that it's any better than your solution... Have you tried > that? No, that isn't necessary at -O0 IMO, user labels are explicitly preserved. -- Eric Botcazou
