On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:42:26AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > i think that this is the right way to go. my view is not just > what the code currently does, but also from the perspective of the > way i want this to work as the back ends evolve.
Here is the updated patch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Ok for trunk? 2011-03-20 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR rtl-optimization/48156 * df-core.c (df_get_bb_dirty): Use df_lr if df_live is NULL, assume df and df_lr are not NULL. * gcc.dg/pr48156.c: New test. --- gcc/df-core.c.jj 2010-12-14 08:11:39.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/df-core.c 2011-03-19 16:09:53.000000000 +0100 @@ -1400,10 +1400,9 @@ df_mark_solutions_dirty (void) bool df_get_bb_dirty (basic_block bb) { - if (df && df_live) - return bitmap_bit_p (df_live->out_of_date_transfer_functions, bb->index); - else - return false; + return bitmap_bit_p ((df_live + ? df_live : df_lr)->out_of_date_transfer_functions, + bb->index); } --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48156.c.jj 2011-03-18 14:57:34.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48156.c 2011-03-18 14:57:14.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +/* PR rtl-optimization/48156 */ +/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-options "-O -fcrossjumping --param min-crossjump-insns=1" } */ + +extern void abort (void); + +static int __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) +equals (int s1, int s2) +{ + return s1 == s2; +} + +static int __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) +bar (void) +{ + return 1; +} + +static void __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) +baz (int f, int j) +{ + if (f != 4 || j != 2) + abort (); +} + +void +foo (int x) +{ + int i = 0, j = bar (); + + if (x == 1) + i = 2; + + if (j && equals (i, j)) + baz (8, i); + else + baz (4, i); +} + +int +main () +{ + foo (1); + return 0; +} Jakub