PING, ok for 4.7?
2011/1/4 Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>:
> On 01/01/2011 01:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>
>> Well, as here no further agreement was found, I post here the
>> alternative suggested by Joseph. I am open-minded which approach will
>> be chosen. I just want to fix this long pending issue.
>> I split up this patch in two parts. The first simply extends the
>> struct attribute_spec by new member 'on_diagnostic' and extends the
>> the uses of this structure by this new field. This new member
>> specifies if the attribute shall be show on diagnostic output, or not.
>
> This seems like a reasonable approach, but I'd prefer to describe/name the
> field as indicating that the attribute affects type compatibility (since
> that's why we want to see the attribute in diagnostics), and making the
> default comp_type_attributes use that information.
>
> Jason
>
--
| (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination
