Hi Gerald,
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> I've read all of the GCC 4.6 changes.html over the weekend and found a
>> couple of issues (mostly nits). The ones I consider obvious are
>> included in the patch below (though I'm not a native speeker and may
>> simply be mistaken), but there are a couple of others:
>
> I realized that based on your input a number of changes were made,
> but we never took care of your own patch. Ooops. I had a look at
> this one, too, and it looks good. Please go ahead and apply it.
I missed that myself, thanks for noticing.
>> - <li>Optimization for Intel Core 2 processor is now available through
>> + <li>Optimization for the Intel Core 2 processor is now available through
>
> This change is correct, I am just wondering whether saying "Intel
> Core 2 processors" might be better, since there is not just one such
> beast, but it's a family.
I wen't for `the Intel Core 2 processors', and finally checked in the
patch.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
