https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce55e48fc4ae41064b01e3241b17e6434fbaf07a
commit r16-6375-gce55e48fc4ae41064b01e3241b17e6434fbaf07a Author: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> Date: Tue Dec 23 13:30:00 2025 -0800 ifcvt: Move noce_try_cond_zero_arith last I noticed that on x86_64 and aarch64, noce_try_cond_zero_arith would produce worse code than noce_try_cmove_arith. So we should do noce_try_cond_zero_arith last instead of before noce_try_cmove_arith. Pushed as obvious after bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu. Also checked to make sure riscv testcases still work. gcc/ChangeLog: * ifcvt.cc (noce_process_if_block): Move noce_try_cond_zero_arith last. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> Diff: --- gcc/ifcvt.cc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc index 75d959f652c5..97033aad482c 100644 --- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc +++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc @@ -4404,14 +4404,14 @@ noce_process_if_block (struct noce_if_info *if_info) goto success; if (noce_try_store_flag_mask (if_info)) goto success; - if (HAVE_conditional_move - && noce_try_cond_zero_arith (if_info)) - goto success; if (HAVE_conditional_move && noce_try_cmove_arith (if_info)) goto success; if (noce_try_sign_mask (if_info)) goto success; + if (HAVE_conditional_move + && noce_try_cond_zero_arith (if_info)) + goto success; } if (!else_bb && set_b)
