https://gcc.gnu.org/g:839618f53ffb773b99cc54fd01307bd0a437cdc7
commit r15-10420-g839618f53ffb773b99cc54fd01307bd0a437cdc7 Author: Alex Coplan <[email protected]> Date: Mon Oct 13 13:41:09 2025 +0000 aarch64, testsuite: Add -fchecking to test options [PR121772] I noticed while testing a backport of the PR121772 fix to GCC 13 that the test wasn't triggering the ICE as expected with the unpatched compiler. This turned out to be because the ICE is a checking ICE, and we configure by default with --enable-checking=release on the branches. Additionally, I hadn't noticed when doing the backports to 15 and 14 since there we still ICE later on in emit_move_insn even if we don't catch the invalid gimple with checking. I'm not too sure why the 13 branch doesn't see the emit_move_insn ICE, but it's somewhat irrelevant - the important thing is that adding -fchecking to the options makes the test fail as expected with an unpatched compiler (i.e. with a gimple checking failure), even on release branches. I considered applying this patch to just the release branches, but figured that trunk will at some point itself become a release branch, so it seems to make most sense just to apply it everywhere. I've checked that the test still passes with this patch, and still fails if I revert the PR121772 fix. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/121772 * gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c: Add -fchecking to dg-options. (cherry picked from commit 0c670d38455c788ac0447e3b86ba621521d44bce) Diff: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c index 3b4cf4d7d189..d47a026c3ce6 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/torture/pr121772.c @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-fchecking" } */ #include <arm_neon.h> int16_t f(int16x4_t b) { return vaddvq_s16(vcombine_s16(b, vdup_n_s16 (0)));
