https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60a7c817d2deb640e9649825a8e4e05293a7ba2d
commit r16-2162-g60a7c817d2deb640e9649825a8e4e05293a7ba2d
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jul 10 10:23:31 2025 +0200
Comment spelling fix: tunning -> tuning
Kyrylo noticed another spelling bug and like usually, the same mistake
happens in multiple places.
2025-07-10 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
* config/i386/x86-tune.def: Change "Tunning the" to "tuning" in
comment and use semicolon instead of dot in comment.
* loop-unroll.cc (decide_unroll_stupid): Comment spelling fix,
tunning -> tuning.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def | 2 +-
gcc/loop-unroll.cc | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
index a039db3cfced..a86cbad281c1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively. If
not, see
- Updating ix86_issue_rate and ix86_adjust_cost in i386.md
- possibly updating ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead, ix86_sched_reorder
and ix86_sched_init_global if those tricks are needed.
- - Tunning the flags below. Those are split into sections and each
+ - tuning flags below; those are split into sections and each
section is very roughly ordered by importance. */
/*****************************************************************************/
diff --git a/gcc/loop-unroll.cc b/gcc/loop-unroll.cc
index 6149cecb28de..c80a6cb6cd0c 100644
--- a/gcc/loop-unroll.cc
+++ b/gcc/loop-unroll.cc
@@ -1185,7 +1185,7 @@ decide_unroll_stupid (class loop *loop, int flags)
/* Do not unroll loops with branches inside -- it increases number
of mispredicts.
- TODO: this heuristic needs tunning; call inside the loop body
+ TODO: this heuristic needs tuning; call inside the loop body
is also relatively good reason to not unroll. */
if (num_loop_branches (loop) > 1)
{
