https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6d0580f1e7448283a2b95161a49d6b3c727655aa
commit r12-11180-g6d0580f1e7448283a2b95161a49d6b3c727655aa
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Apr 14 19:34:22 2025 +0200
expmed: Always use QImode for init_expmed set_zero_cost [PR119785]
This is a regression on some targets introduced I believe by r6-2055
which added mode argument to set_src_cost.
The problem here is that in the first iteration, mode is always QImode
and we get as -Os zero cost set_src_cost (const0_rtx, QImode, false).
But then we use the mode variable for iterating over int, partial int
and vector int modes, so for the second iteration we call set_src_cost
with mode which is at that time (machine_mode) (MAX_MODE_VECTOR_INT + 1).
In the x86 case that happens to be V2HFmode and we don't crash (and
compute the same 0 cost as we would for QImode).
But e.g. in the SPARC case (machine_mode) (MAX_MODE_VECTOR_INT + 1) is
MAX_MACHINE_MODE and that does all kinds of weird things especially
when doing ubsan bootstrap.
Fixed by always using QImode.
2025-04-14 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/119785
* expmed.cc (init_expmed): Always pass QImode rather than mode to
set_src_cost passed to set_zero_cost.
(cherry picked from commit f96a54350afcf7f3c90d0ecb51d7683d826acc00)
Diff:
---
gcc/expmed.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/expmed.cc b/gcc/expmed.cc
index 39e53faec70e..9c3bf094f896 100644
--- a/gcc/expmed.cc
+++ b/gcc/expmed.cc
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ init_expmed (void)
for (speed = 0; speed < 2; speed++)
{
crtl->maybe_hot_insn_p = speed;
- set_zero_cost (speed, set_src_cost (const0_rtx, mode, speed));
+ set_zero_cost (speed, set_src_cost (const0_rtx, QImode, speed));
for (mode = MIN_MODE_INT; mode <= MAX_MODE_INT;
mode = (machine_mode)(mode + 1))
