https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eedc24854259a0e804040cfcc50a9c20f761f382
commit r16-1339-geedc24854259a0e804040cfcc50a9c20f761f382 Author: Piotr Trojanek <troja...@adacore.com> Date: Mon Mar 17 12:57:26 2025 +0100 ada: Fix glitch in handling of Atomic_Components on generic formal type In Ada 2022 aspects Atomic_Components and Volatile_Components can be specified for a formal array type, but then they need to be set on the base type entity. Otherwise we get an assertion failure in debug build and wrong legality errors in production builds. gcc/ada/ChangeLog: * sem_prag.adb (Analyze_Pragma): If pragmas apply to a formal array type, then set the flags on the base type. Diff: --- gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb index 4090d0c71175..01983f9d89fd 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb @@ -14689,7 +14689,9 @@ package body Sem_Prag is then -- The flag is set on the base type, or on the object - if Nkind (D) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then + if Nkind (D) in N_Full_Type_Declaration + | N_Formal_Type_Declaration + then E := Base_Type (E); end if;