https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1dc1c1e7f0bb3a295eff1bc8c5d4f4d4b2898d50

commit r14-11779-g1dc1c1e7f0bb3a295eff1bc8c5d4f4d4b2898d50
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed May 14 10:38:47 2025 -0400

    c++: wrong-code with consteval constructor [PR117501]
    
    We've had a wrong-code problem since r14-4140, due to which we
    forget to initialize a variable.
    
    In consteval39.C, we evaluate
    
        struct QQQ q;
      <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
        QQQ::QQQ (&q, TARGET_EXPR <D.2687, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr
          5
          __ct_comp
          D.2687
          (struct basic_string_view *) <<< Unknown tree: void_cst >>>
          (const char *) "" >>>>) >>>>>;
    
    into
    
        struct QQQ q;
      <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
        {.data={._M_len=42, ._M_str=0}} >>>>>;
    
    and then the useless expr_stmt is dropped on the floor, so q isn't
    initialized.  As pre-r14-4140, we need to handle constructors specially.
    
    With this patch, we generate:
    
        struct QQQ q;
      <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
        q = {.data={._M_len=42, ._M_str=0}} >>>>>;
    
    initializing q properly.
    
            PR c++/117501
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * cp-gimplify.cc (cp_build_init_expr_for_ctor): New.
            (cp_fold_immediate_r): Call it.
            (cp_fold): Break out code into cp_build_init_expr_for_ctor.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval39.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval40.C: New test.
    
    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc                    | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval39.C | 27 ++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval40.C | 25 +++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
index 37dc4a286a0a..845243edbd0d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
@@ -1179,6 +1179,31 @@ taking_address_of_imm_fn_error (tree expr, tree decl)
   maybe_explain_promoted_consteval (loc, decl);
 }
 
+/* Build up an INIT_EXPR to initialize the object of a constructor call that
+   has been folded to a constant value.  CALL is the CALL_EXPR for the
+   constructor call; INIT is the value.  */
+
+static tree
+cp_build_init_expr_for_ctor (tree call, tree init)
+{
+  tree a = CALL_EXPR_ARG (call, 0);
+  if (is_dummy_object (a))
+    return init;
+  const bool return_this = targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this ();
+  const location_t loc = EXPR_LOCATION (call);
+  if (return_this)
+    a = cp_save_expr (a);
+  tree s = build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (loc, a);
+  init = cp_build_init_expr (s, init);
+  if (return_this)
+    {
+      init = build2_loc (loc, COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (call), init,
+                        fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (call), a));
+      suppress_warning (init);
+    }
+  return init;
+}
+
 /* A subroutine of cp_fold_r to handle immediate functions.  */
 
 static tree
@@ -1294,7 +1319,12 @@ cp_fold_immediate_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, 
void *data_)
        }
       /* We've evaluated the consteval function call.  */
       if (call_p)
-       *stmt_p = e;
+       {
+         if (code == CALL_EXPR && DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (decl))
+           *stmt_p = cp_build_init_expr_for_ctor (stmt, e);
+         else
+           *stmt_p = e;
+       }
     }
   /* We've encountered a function call that may turn out to be consteval
      later.  Store its caller so that we can ensure that the call is
@@ -3428,21 +3458,7 @@ cp_fold (tree x, fold_flags_t flags)
         if (TREE_CODE (r) != CALL_EXPR)
          {
            if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (callee))
-             {
-               loc = EXPR_LOCATION (x);
-               tree a = CALL_EXPR_ARG (x, 0);
-               bool return_this = targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this ();
-               if (return_this)
-                 a = cp_save_expr (a);
-               tree s = build_fold_indirect_ref_loc (loc, a);
-               r = cp_build_init_expr (s, r);
-               if (return_this)
-                 {
-                   r = build2_loc (loc, COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (x), r,
-                                   fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (x), a));
-                   suppress_warning (r);
-                 }
-             }
+             r = cp_build_init_expr_for_ctor (x, r);
            x = r;
            break;
          }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval39.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval39.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..523e8260eab2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval39.C
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// PR c++/117501
+// { dg-do run { target c++20 } }
+
+constexpr unsigned
+length ()
+{
+  bool __trans_tmp_1 = __builtin_is_constant_evaluated();
+  if (__trans_tmp_1)
+    return 42;
+  return 1;
+}
+struct basic_string_view {
+  constexpr basic_string_view(const char *) : _M_len{length()}, _M_str{} {}
+  long _M_len;
+  char _M_str;
+};
+struct QQQ {
+  consteval QQQ(basic_string_view d) : data(d) {}
+  basic_string_view data;
+};
+int
+main ()
+{
+  QQQ q("");
+  if (q.data._M_len != 42)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval40.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval40.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4d3ba20092b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval40.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/117501
+// { dg-do run { target c++20 } }
+
+constexpr int
+twiddle (int i)
+{
+ if (__builtin_is_constant_evaluated ())
+    return 3;
+  return i;
+}
+struct S {
+  constexpr S(int i) : i{twiddle (i)} {}
+  int i;
+};
+struct Q {
+  consteval Q(S s_) : s{s_, s_} {}
+  S s[2];
+};
+int
+main ()
+{
+  Q q(twiddle (42));
+  if (q.s[0].i != 3 || q.s[1].i != 3)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}

Reply via email to