https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbd41cd2915cc9b980952cc17b6979deb3696fbb
commit r13-9462-gcbd41cd2915cc9b980952cc17b6979deb3696fbb
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Oct 30 21:10:58 2024 +0000
libstdc++: Fix some typos and grammatical errors in docs
Also remove some redundant 'void' parameters from code examples.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml: Fix typos and grammatical
errors.
* doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html: Regenerate.
(cherry picked from commit 96566cc46d633c2026976e585b5743e880a8f99b)
Diff:
---
libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html | 10 +++++-----
libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html
b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html
index cf9e7026b3fa..eb4501b1f6ba 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
</dd></dl></div></div><div class="section"><div
class="titlepage"><div><div><h3 class="title"><a
id="intro.using.exception.no"></a>Doing without</h3></div></div></div><p>
C++ is a language that strives to be as efficient as is possible
in delivering features. As such, considerable care is used by both
- language implementer and designers to make sure unused features
+ language implementer and designers to make sure unused features do
not impose hidden or unexpected costs. The GNU system tries to be
as flexible and as configurable as possible. So, it should come as
no surprise that GNU C++ provides an optional language extension,
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
uses <code class="literal">try</code> or <code
class="literal">catch</code>, you
shouldn't use <code class="literal">-fno-exceptions</code>.
</p><p>
- And what it to be gained, tinkering in the back alleys with a
+ And what is to be gained, tinkering in the back alleys with a
language like this? Exception handling overhead can be measured
in the size of the executable binary, and varies with the
capabilities of the underlying operating system and specific
@@ -216,15 +216,15 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
# define __throw_exception_again
#endif
</pre><p>
- In addition, for every object derived from
+ In addition, for most of the classes derived from
class <code class="classname">exception</code>, there exists a corresponding
function with C language linkage. An example:
</p><pre class="programlisting">
#if __cpp_exceptions
- void __throw_bad_exception(void)
+ void __throw_bad_exception()
{ throw bad_exception(); }
#else
- void __throw_bad_exception(void)
+ void __throw_bad_exception()
{ abort(); }
#endif
</pre><p>
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml
b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml
index 9b884ab0817b..ac2ba9dffd45 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
<para>
C++ is a language that strives to be as efficient as is possible
in delivering features. As such, considerable care is used by both
- language implementer and designers to make sure unused features
+ language implementer and designers to make sure unused features do
not impose hidden or unexpected costs. The GNU system tries to be
as flexible and as configurable as possible. So, it should come as
no surprise that GNU C++ provides an optional language extension,
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
</para>
<para>
- And what it to be gained, tinkering in the back alleys with a
+ And what is to be gained, tinkering in the back alleys with a
language like this? Exception handling overhead can be measured
in the size of the executable binary, and varies with the
capabilities of the underlying operating system and specific
@@ -344,17 +344,17 @@ exception neutrality and exception safety.
</programlisting>
<para>
- In addition, for every object derived from
+ In addition, for most of the classes derived from
class <classname>exception</classname>, there exists a corresponding
function with C language linkage. An example:
</para>
<programlisting>
#if __cpp_exceptions
- void __throw_bad_exception(void)
+ void __throw_bad_exception()
{ throw bad_exception(); }
#else
- void __throw_bad_exception(void)
+ void __throw_bad_exception()
{ abort(); }
#endif
</programlisting>
