https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ba3e5ff14a48f1fb7ca53cb86194e08d5b5da66

commit r15-7869-g0ba3e5ff14a48f1fb7ca53cb86194e08d5b5da66
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 6 17:58:14 2025 +0100

    c++: Fix up instantiation of pointer/reference/array types with attributes 
[PR119138]
    
    My r15-7822 PR118787 change unfortunately broke build on x86_64-w64-mingw32.
    The reduced testcase below shows what is going on.
    va_list on this target is char * with extra (non-dependent) attributes
    on it.
    Before my r15-7822 change, instantiation of such type used the fast path and
    just returned t, but as it has non-NULL TYPE_ATTRIBUTES, it now falls
    through, builds a pointer type and then calls
    apply_late_template_attributes.  And in there triggers a bug, that function
    has been written for types with RECORD_TYPE/UNION_TYPE (or ENUMERAL_TYPE?)
    in mind, where we call apply_late_template_attributes with
    ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE and can just apply the non-dependent attributes
    directly to TYPE_ATTRIBUTES.  That is wrong for shared types like
    {POINTER,REFERENCE,ARRAY}_TYPE etc., we should just force
    cp_build_type_attribute_variant to build a variant type for the
    non-dependent attributes and then process dependent attributes (which
    given attr_flag will DTRT already).
    
    The second change in the patch is an optimization, we can actually return
    back to returning t even when TYPE_ATTRIBUTES is non-NULL, as long as it
    is non-dependent (dependent attributes are stored first, so it is enough
    to check the first attribute).
    
    2025-03-06  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
    
            PR c++/119138
            * pt.cc (apply_late_template_attributes): Set p to NULL if
            ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE is not set in attr_flags.
            (tsubst) <case POINTER_TYPE, case REFERENCE_TYPE, case ARRAY_TYPE>:
            Reuse original type even if TYPE_ATTRIBUTES is non-NULL, but all
            the attributes are non-dependent.
    
            * g++.dg/template/pr119138.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                             |  9 ++++++---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr119138.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index c09a934580f2..2775af7701b8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -12393,7 +12393,8 @@ apply_late_template_attributes (tree *decl_p, tree 
attributes, int attr_flags,
          to our attributes parameter.  */
       gcc_assert (*p == attributes);
     }
-  else if (FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (*decl_p))
+  else if (FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (*decl_p)
+          || (attr_flags & ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE) == 0)
     p = NULL;
   else
     {
@@ -16867,7 +16868,8 @@ tsubst (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, 
tree in_decl)
       {
        if (type == TREE_TYPE (t)
            && TREE_CODE (type) != METHOD_TYPE
-           && TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t) == NULL_TREE)
+           && (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t) == NULL_TREE
+               || !ATTR_IS_DEPENDENT (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t))))
          return t;
 
        /* [temp.deduct]
@@ -17029,7 +17031,8 @@ tsubst (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, 
tree in_decl)
           it will obviously be the same as T.  */
        if (type == TREE_TYPE (t)
            && domain == TYPE_DOMAIN (t)
-           && TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t) == NULL_TREE)
+           && (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t) == NULL_TREE
+               || !ATTR_IS_DEPENDENT (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t))))
          return t;
 
        /* These checks should match the ones in create_array_type_for_decl.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr119138.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr119138.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b0893872f2c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/pr119138.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/119138
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+#include <stdarg.h>
+
+template <typename>
+void
+foo (va_list)
+{
+}
+
+void
+bar (va_list ap)
+{
+  foo <char> (ap);
+}

Reply via email to