https://gcc.gnu.org/g:173cf7c9b8c0d61bb2cb0bd3a9e3150b393ab59a

commit r15-7810-g173cf7c9b8c0d61bb2cb0bd3a9e3150b393ab59a
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 27 17:42:49 2025 -0500

    c++: ICE with RANGE_EXPR and array init [PR109431]
    
    We crash because we generate
    
      {[0 ... 1]={.low=0, .high=1}, [1]={.low=0, .high=1}}
    
    which output_constructor_regular_field doesn't want to see.  This
    happens since r9-1483: process_init_constructor_array can now create
    a RANGE_EXPR.  But the bug isn't in that patch; the problem is that
    build_vec_init doesn't handle RANGE_EXPRs.
    
    build_vec_init has a FOR_EACH_CONSTRUCTOR_ELT loop which populates
    const_vec.  In this case it loops over the elements of
    
      {[0 ... 1]={.low=0, .high=1}}
    
    but assumes that each element initializes one element.  So after the
    loop num_initialized_elts was 1, and then below:
    
                  HOST_WIDE_INT last = tree_to_shwi (maxindex);
                  if (num_initialized_elts <= last)
                    {
                      tree field = size_int (num_initialized_elts);
                      if (num_initialized_elts != last)
                        field = build2 (RANGE_EXPR, sizetype, field,
                                        size_int (last));
                      CONSTRUCTOR_APPEND_ELT (const_vec, field, e);
                    }
    
    we added the extra initializer.
    
    It seemed convenient to use range_expr_nelts like below.
    
            PR c++/109431
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * cp-tree.h (range_expr_nelts): Declare.
            * init.cc (build_vec_init): If the CONSTRUCTOR's index is a
            RANGE_EXPR, use range_expr_nelts to count how many elements
            were initialized.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/init/array67.C: New test.
    
    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                    |  1 +
 gcc/cp/init.cc                      |  5 ++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array67.C | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index c76a92dd39be..583d04963642 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -8621,6 +8621,7 @@ extern tree mangle_decomp                 (tree, 
vec<tree> &);
 extern void mangle_module_substitution         (int);
 extern int mangle_module_component             (tree id, bool partition);
 extern tree mangle_module_global_init          (int);
+extern unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT range_expr_nelts (tree);
 
 /* in dump.cc */
 extern bool cp_dump_tree                       (void *, tree);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.cc b/gcc/cp/init.cc
index f77da4267cbd..ce6e58e05f2f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.cc
@@ -4802,7 +4802,10 @@ build_vec_init (tree base, tree maxindex, tree init,
          tree baseref = build1 (INDIRECT_REF, type, base);
          tree one_init;
 
-         num_initialized_elts++;
+         if (field && TREE_CODE (field) == RANGE_EXPR)
+           num_initialized_elts += range_expr_nelts (field);
+         else
+           num_initialized_elts++;
 
          /* We need to see sub-array TARGET_EXPR before cp_fold_r so we can
             handle cleanup flags properly.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array67.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array67.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8aee8fd481a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/array67.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// PR c++/109431
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+
+struct RangeLimits
+{
+    int low = 0;
+    int high = 1;
+    constexpr RangeLimits() { }
+};
+
+template <int>
+int parameterLimits(void)
+{
+    static RangeLimits constexpr param_limits[2] = {};
+    if (param_limits[0].low != 0
+       || param_limits[0].high != 1
+       || param_limits[1].low != 0
+       || param_limits[1].high != 1)
+      __builtin_abort ();
+    auto const &limits = param_limits[1];
+    return 0;
+}
+
+auto s = parameterLimits<1>();
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+}

Reply via email to