https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eaf4808e122b00e57a17e543d81cfa1720331d61
commit eaf4808e122b00e57a17e543d81cfa1720331d61
Author: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com>
Date: Fri Feb 7 04:14:48 2025 -0300
[testsuite] tolerate later success [PR108357]
On leon3-elf and presumably on other targets, the test fails due to
differences in calling conventions and other reasons, that add extra
gimple stmts that prevent the expected optimization at the expected
point. The optimization takes place anyway, just a little later, so
tolerate that.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR tree-optimization/108357
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c: Tolerate later optimization.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c
index 44c457b7a977..7dff235f8927 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr108357.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-threadfull1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
static char b;
static unsigned c;
@@ -19,4 +19,7 @@ int main()
f(g);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "foo" "threadfull1" } } */
+/* We expect threadfull1 to eliminate the call to foo(), but not all targets
+ manage that at that point. Calling conventions (mandatory promotion) play a
+ role, but there's more than that. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "foo" "optimized" } } */
