https://gcc.gnu.org/g:677122c9df1b55a791a54426269f7a8ce794f947

commit r15-7384-g677122c9df1b55a791a54426269f7a8ce794f947
Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Date:   Wed Feb 5 13:17:47 2025 +0100

    rtl-optimization/117922 - disable fold-mem-offsets for highly connected CFG
    
    The PR shows fold-mem-offsets taking ages and a lot of memory computing
    DU/UD chains as that requires the RD problem.  The issue is not so much
    the memory required for the pruned sets but the high CFG connectivity
    (and that the CFG is cyclic) which makes solving the dataflow problem
    expensive.
    
    The following adds the same limit as the one imposed by GCSE and CPROP.
    
            PR rtl-optimization/117922
            * fold-mem-offsets.cc (pass_fold_mem_offsets::execute):
            Do nothing for a highly connected CFG.

Diff:
---
 gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc b/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc
index a816006e2078..c1c94472a071 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc
+++ b/gcc/fold-mem-offsets.cc
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "df.h"
 #include "tree-pass.h"
 #include "cfgrtl.h"
+#include "diagnostic-core.h"
 
 /* This pass tries to optimize memory offset calculations by moving constants
    from add instructions to the memory instructions (loads / stores).
@@ -841,6 +842,23 @@ do_commit_insn (rtx_insn *insn)
 unsigned int
 pass_fold_mem_offsets::execute (function *fn)
 {
+  /* Computing UD/DU chains for flow graphs which have a high connectivity
+     will take a long time and is unlikely to be particularly useful.
+
+     In normal circumstances a cfg should have about twice as many
+     edges as blocks.  But we do not want to punish small functions
+     which have a couple switch statements.  Rather than simply
+     threshold the number of blocks, uses something with a more
+     graceful degradation.  */
+  if (n_edges_for_fn (fn) > 20000 + n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fn) * 4)
+    {
+      warning (OPT_Wdisabled_optimization,
+              "fold-mem-offsets: %d basic blocks and %d edges/basic block",
+              n_basic_blocks_for_fn (cfun),
+              n_edges_for_fn (cfun) / n_basic_blocks_for_fn (cfun));
+      return 0;
+    }
+
   df_set_flags (DF_EQ_NOTES + DF_RD_PRUNE_DEAD_DEFS + DF_DEFER_INSN_RESCAN);
   df_chain_add_problem (DF_UD_CHAIN + DF_DU_CHAIN);
   df_analyze ();

Reply via email to